Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: PHOTO-3D digest 1264


  • From: P3D <wwstrat@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: PHOTO-3D digest 1264
  • Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 10:24:45 -0500

> There doesn't seem to be much hope for a strong revival
>of still 3d photography  -  unless it lies with lenticular >prints.

>Allow me to disagree with this statement too.  Anyone who has seen a 3-d
>Realist slide and compared it to a lenticular print knows that there is NO
>comparison between the two.  Why settle with something inferior?
>I'd have to disagree.  Motion parallax, an important depth cue
>in movies (and in real life), is if anything more innate than
>stereo.  More animals have it and it shows up earlier in life in
>humans than stereo does.  Unlike stereo (which goes to pieces
>pretty quickly when you move out of the fovea) it works pretty
>much equally well throughout the visual field.  It's also
>potentially useful over a much larger range of distances.
  
   I personally find it hard to get even my family to put on glasses
 or look through a viewer.  I feel that the general public really
 only appreciates auto stereoscopic still images. You are correct 
 That lenticulars have limits, But have you ever seen a  large format
 backlit lenticular they are very impressive.  

>I'd have to disagree.  Motion parallax, an important depth cue
>in movies (and in real life), is if anything more innate than
>stereo.  More animals have it and it shows up earlier in life in
>humans than stereo does.  Unlike stereo (which goes to pieces
>pretty quickly when you move out of the fovea) it works pretty
>much equally well throughout the visual field.  It's also
>potentially useful over a much larger range of distances.

   I have been thinking of ways  motion parallax in lenticulars, not 
 lenticular animations but something like mounting a print to a glass 
 plate with a pivot points  at middle top and bottom, then using a 
 transducer on the left edge,  rapidly cycling 3 narrow base images
 to the  viewer, seeing 12,23,12,23,12.....  ????? would this be 
 motion parallax and what frequency range might work?
  This might just be a blurry mess? I have only tried a quick test with
 a speaker for a transducer but don't have a frequency generator and
 could not adjust the travel distance.

Thanks for letting indulge in my fantasy quest for autostereoscopic total
immersion .

 Thanks Bill S.
-----------------------------------------------------------
William Stratemeyer jr.
ADVANCED DISPLAY SYSTEMS
Custom Lenticular printing
1308 E. Libby Dr.
W.P. Bch. Fla.    33406       
 Phone:   (407) 434-0189  after 4:00 pm & weekends
wwstrat@xxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------