Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Beta and lessons in marketing (was Slide file and Beta)
- From: P3D Bill Costa - UNH Computing & Information Srvs <W_COSTA@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Beta and lessons in marketing (was Slide file and Beta)
- Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 17:39:11 -0400 (EDT)
Derek Gee recently wrote in part...
> Betacam is not 'slightly modified'...Try comparing Super-VHS to Super
> Beta if you'd like a more accurate comparison.
Quite true.
> From a professional point of view, both VHS and consumer Beta formats
> suck.
Here here!
> It is a large LIE that Beta is superior to VHS.
Not a lie, a real difference of opinion. In terms of image quality,
tape handling (i.e. ability to quickly change modes), etc. etc. - at
any give point of time, many people including myself felt that Beta had
the edge. The one clear advantage VHS has always been able to maintain
over Beta at any given point in time was the ability to make longer
recordings on one cartridge. But otherwise.... I remember back when it
was a real horse race, video magazines referred to VHS as
`clunk-a-vision' --- and with good reason.
> I'm dreadfully tired of the VHS vs
> Beta arguements that all those sore losers who bought Beta machines
> keep bringing up, so I'll say no more on this.
I've always owned both, so I don't know if I qualify as a sore loser.
But I think the Beta vs. VHS format wars serves as an excellent example
of the strength of marketing. Sony made a number of serious marketing
mistakes with Beta - one of the chief ones being that they charged
companies too much for licensing the Beta format. JVC's licensing for
VHS was much cheaper. Couple that the Japanese concept of `families'
of companies that prefer to deal with each other, and Sony found itself
with only a few partners while JVC had many.
So my justification for this post to the 3D list is to point out that
because of the current state of technology and the public interest in
Virtual Reality, we may see companies attempt to market 3D gear - this
time video. It would be unfortunate if we once again have a war of
formats. I think Sony learned a valuable lesson. Look at the recent
compromise on the new video CD format between (I believe) the Sony and
Toshiba camps. One can only hope that a single video 3D format will
emerge early and be supported by all players.
Later....BC
PS: I personally believe that if Beta had won, nobody would today be
lamenting the loss of VHS. The fact that Sony invented the technology
behind both Beta *and* VHS (i.e. u-wrap and m-wrap technology), the
fact that Sony went with the u-wrap (Beta) technology says volumes.
We could continue the debate off-line if you'd like, but I doubt any
minds will be changed on either side. ;-)
## ## ## ## +----------------------------[ Bill.Costa@xxxxxxx ]---+
## ### ## ## | Bill Costa |
## #### ## ## | CIS - Kingsbury Hall |
## ## ## ######## | 33 College Road PHONE: +1-603-862-3056 |
## ## #### ## | University of New Hampshire FAX: +1-603-862-4778 |
## ## ### ## | Durham, NH 03824-3591 USA |
####### ## ## +----------------[ No good deed goes un-punished. ]---+
------------------------------
|