Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Parallax differences...
- From: P3D Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Parallax differences...
- Date: Sun, 09 Jun 1996 22:10:20 -0400
P3D wrote:
> ... are the primary determinant in stereopis. Well, to be exact, the rapid
> comparison of parallax differences.
>
> I am convinced by the following "proofs":
>
> Fix your gaze on an object... do not move your head!... do not shift your
> gaze from the object!
I believe that this is virtually impossible to achieve for a number of reasons,
including our biological tendency to exhibit small unconsious "scanning" eye
movements no matter how hard we try to "fix" our gaze.
This (among other more consequential reasons) is why the many and varied
discussions of real time perception versus single fixed image perception (that
is, comparing "life" in real time to a fixed "snapshot" or recording of life)
whether it be stereo, plano, sight, sound, olefaction, whatever, is not a
meaningful one. Even if a proper "apples to apples" comparison could be achieved
in a rigorous test environment, it is unclear what relevence it would have in
the "real world" of perception and imaging.
People use "real time" analyses in their perceptions of incoming stimuli.
Studying the mechanisms involved with "fixed" image perception is certainly
interesting, but not necessarily fruitful in yielding much insight into what
happens in real time.
Eric G.
egoldste@xxxxxx
------------------------------
|