Re: On the demise of 3D in the 50s

[P3D Allan Woods <allanwx@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>But, like Rick, I cannot help but notice the poor 
>quality of much of the amateur 3-d work from the 50s.
>
>George Themelis
>
>
Hold on there!  Just because someone is at the leading edge
of the "Boomer" generation doesn't automatically mean his/her
3-d pictures won't be any good!

Granted, eyesight may begin to fail so focusing may be a
little off and memory may have lapses so that "sweet 16"
is a photographic subject rather than a rule of exposure;
and it gets harder to deal with those tiny little images
and get them in the holders the right way round and straight...

...but that's no reason to turn on a guy because of his age!

I hope my 3-D work won't be so harshly judged when I am in
my 50s!

(Do you suppose the older you get, the more medication you need?)

allanwx@xxxxxxxxxx



------------------------------