Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
re: slides vs prints
- From: P3D <MDRobb@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: re: slides vs prints
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 21:36:30 -0400
On Mon, 12 Aug 1996, Alan Rogers <alan_rogers@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>i'm new to this, so pardon the following stupid question... I was told that
>i should shoot 3d's on slide film only. is this true? the problem with slide
>film is its sensitivity - no latitude like you get with print film. my
>problem is my camera is built from cheapie point and shoot 35's with fixed
>focus lenses, aperture and shutter speed. not a good combination for
>sensitive film.
> suggestions or help. for what it's worth, i haven't shot my first roll(s)
>with this yet, i'm waiting for advice.
> -alan
Alan,
I got started in 3-D photography with two real cheap ($25) fixed focus
35mm cameras. I wired the shutter release contacts together and
"Velcroed" them onto an aluminum bar. I used only print film in
these cameras and had it processed at K-Mart. The viewer I used
was a ViewMagic over/under format viewer, available from Joel
Alpers of Rocky Mountain Memories. It produced very nice stereo
pairs that I still view. So....to answer your question, you can
certainly use print film for your stereo pairs. You just need to
have an appropriate viewer.
Marc
mdrobb@xxxxxxx
------------------------------
|