Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: PHOTO-3D digest 1462


  • From: P3D Gregory J. Wageman <gjw@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: PHOTO-3D digest 1462
  • Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 14:07:42 -0700

Mark Kernes queries:

>Which leads me to the question, what would prevent some entrepreneur from
>running both left and right reels of a polarized 3D film through twin
>projectors with the proper filters in place, recording the result on a third
>reel of film and showing that for use with the proper polarized glasses? Is
>there something about the process of polarization itself that prevents this?

Yes.  Normal film emulsion won't retain the polarization.  The resulting
single-strip film will be randomly polarized.  There *is* a process
that allows the film itself to polarize the projected image, but it
is *very* expensive.

>On another topic, is there some reason the Nimslo or Nishika Opti-Lite flash
>is unsuitable for taking photos with a Realist-type camera? I have both and
>before I waste a roll of film experimenting, I thought I'd ask.

I've got the Nishika unit; it lacks a PC connection, so unless you modify
the Realist hot shoe and/or the flash to both fit and make the electrical
connection, or build an adaptor that doesn't require a PC cord, you're
stuck.  Don't know about the Nimslo.  Aside from the above and the general
lack of power, though, there's no technical reason. :-)

I personally use a Metz 45-CL1 handle-mount, with excellent results.

	-Greg


------------------------------