Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: PHOTO-3D digest 1518
- From: P3D Ronald J Beck 840196 <rbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: PHOTO-3D digest 1518
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 12:35:28 -0500
photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said (actually it was Dr T...):
> ...And how many requests did I get for the less than $100 Dr. T
> supercharged Realist red button viewers? Exactly Zero!!! It's
> amazing!
>
> This is the sad state of affairs in 3D. Much less interest than most
> people imagine, even from the active stereo photographers. As John
> Vala says, someone can make a successful 3D product (or run a
> serious business selling 3D products) only if they target the
> general population. If they have to rely on existing hard-core 3D
> enthusiasts, then they will have to treat this as a hobby and keep
> their "day jobs" to make a living.
You can also look at the sales of lenticular cameras to see how quickly 3D
is (not) catching on with the general public. There is now a disposable
lenticular camera on the market yet you don't see people beating down the
door to purchase it. And, it really does a pretty good job of producing
viewerless 3D photos.
Now, what I'd like to see catch on, which has been mentioned here before,
is the use of the new Advantix film to produce stereo pairs. First,
Advantix (is that APS?) slide film and a camera that would produce stereo
pairs on that film. Next, a viewer, similar to the 3D filmstrip viewer
mentioned in previous posts (Dr T has one I believe) which you would drop
your developed film cartridge into, have it load up and view through the
eyepiece, use the motorized drive to advance each frame pair, and use the
magnetic strip to record minute adjustments for optimum viewind and/or a
"skip" button to skip the frame all together. Last, but certainly not
least, a projection system so that the slides could be viewed by a room
full of people. Ideally the viewer would simply be placed in a projection
unit.
Could it be done? Well, I'm naieve enough to believe that anything that
is perceived can be achieved! Would it catch on? Maybe if it had enough
marketing hype to go along with it. Would it be expensive? Probably!
Would anyone on this list buy such a system? Well... those who enjoy
"rolling their own" probably would shy away from a system that takes the
"artistry" of slide mounting out of the equation. However, for the
"masses" of point & shooters out there, such a system might just be
attractive. Especially if it were marketed as a camera/viewer combination
and cost under $100.00 (US).
Well, that's my $0.02 for today. A grand idea who's time may someday
come. If I just had some capital....
Ron
------------------------------
|