Re: What is APS?

[P3D Michael Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Don't want to spend too much time off topic, but the camera to which you
> refer, although it is one of the best available for normal non-static
> photographic situations, does not have nearly enough resolution for
> stereo as we know it, and is not considered adequate by most
> photographers I know for anything other than the crudist
> "run-and-gun/daily news rag" 85 line screen photojournalist work.

Not even good enough for 3d photo's of aunt martha?  :-)

In any case, the subject had been about 10~15 years in the future.
Take a look at what digital cameras looked like and cost and
performed 10~15 years ago, and compare with what they are now.

Now project 10~15 years from now.

Should be adequate for Aunt Martha then, if not now.  

We aren't talking about having to be world class results.  At 
least some of us don't achieve that now.  Even with film.

Mike K.




------------------------------