Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Fuzzy 3D for the masses?



Gabriel my2cents Jacob writes:

>The masses use single use cameras
>and they will go for the same quality in 3d. Sure it is fuzzier 
>but the 3d effect is exactly the same from what I can see in my
>experience and the fuzziness is not a detriment in the 3d mode.

Fuzziness is much more distrurbing in 3D than 2D.

So, fuzzy 3D is OK as long at it is 3D.  3D is treated as a
passing fad again.  After the novelty is gone all that 
will be left is bad 3D.  I am past the "wow 3D" factor.
An unsharp 3D picture is unacceptable for me.  People who
use single use 2D cameras and are satisfied with crummy 2D
prints should try better 2D first before advancing to 3D.

That's my2drachmas. -- George Themelis


------------------------------