Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Sunny 16
- From: P3D Michael Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Sunny 16
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 96 07:48:16 PDT
>
> A properly used light meter can give results unmatched by any exposure
> table or rule, because these rules by definition are incident only and
This is probably true. Under optimal conditions, "thinking-only" can
probably at best only match using a light meter. Why?....
To use "thinking only":
1) Guess how bright the light is
2) Think about things and make camera exposure setting(s)
To use light meter(s):
1) Measure how bright the light is AND guess how bright the light is
2) Think about things and make camera exposure setting(s)
Of course, both methods can have problems if a step is left out
or not done well. :-)
Using a light meter is a method that's a *superset* of not using one.
Not a different method.
Mike K.
P.S. - I'm only repeating what others have written, I just thought I'd be
a little more explicit rather than just hinting. :-)
------------------------------
|