Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Sunny 16 versus meters
- From: P3D Michael Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Sunny 16 versus meters
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 96 22:36:32 PDT
I was quoted....
> From: P3D P3D Michael Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This is probably true. Under optimal conditions, "thinking-only" can
> > probably at best only match using a light meter. Why?....
> >
Then Greg was quoted....
> From: P3D P3D Gregory J. Wageman <gjw@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > So how invariant are sunlight conditions around the globe? Is a sunny
> > smoggy noontime in L.A. really photometrically equivalent to noon in, say
> > the Swiss Alps (and I don't mean in snow)? What about seasonal variations,
> > like noon on the summer solstice, vs. noon on the winter solstice at a
>
> Contrary to what is quoted above, an incident light meter is actually
> often just right for slides, which is what I take with my Realist format
> camera, and some of the time with my Nimslo. Consider my serious photography,
> which often involves a California native shrub with nice flowers, at far, near,
> and closeup distances. With my Minolta Maxxum 700si, which has very fancy
~
>
> For this sort of work, an incident light meter is really better. Furthermore,
> the f/16 rule is not bad if you can see a sharp shadow edge and your shadow
> is markedly shorter than you are. The reason is that in both the tropics and
>
> Anyway, my point is that the f/16 rule is often adequate, and that sometimes
> better than even a pretty good meter.
I don't understand how that which I wrote is "Contrary" to what you said. I
said that at best "thinking" will only match using a light meter (plus thinking).
Or are you saying that using a light meter in a think-free light meter fashion
instead of thinking will *always* yield a better exposure? That'd be the only
way to logically be contrary to what I said.
Note that even random camera settings are capable of sometimes giving perfect
exposures which a light meter cannot beat!
Mike K.
P.S. - My original point was that you *still* think when using a light meter. One
doesn't necessarily use the sunny-16 rule because one eventually learns about
what setting works for a particular lighting situation. So it's being used
indirectly by "table lookup" rather than by computation. This cross-checks
what a light meter says and judgements are made from the results.
------------------------------
End of PHOTO-3D Digest 1597
***************************
***************************
Trouble? Send e-mail to
wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe select one of the following,
place it in the BODY of a message and send it to:
listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
unsubscribe photo-3d
unsubscribe mc68hc11
unsubscribe overland-trails
unsubscribe icom
***************************
|