Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

A&I vs. Kodalux


  • From: P3D Harold R. Baize, Ph.D. <baize@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: A&I vs. Kodalux
  • Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 12:42:50 -0700

Mark Josephson  wrote:

>I've never had problems with Kodak's method of returning film, lately it
>has come back loosely rolled in a protective sleeve, which comes to you
>inside a cardboard tube.  Unfortunately, though, I always 20% of the last
>picture on every roll,  Their service is pretty fast, considering that
>they seem to send stuff I give them to Dallas.  Takes about a week

>For those who use A&I, do they cut the roll at the end too far up as well?

I recent switched from Kodalux to A&I for this very reason. A&I does NOT
cut off the last frame. They also return the film in 3 working days, 
which is 2-3 days faster than Kodalux. Another reason I switched is
that Kodalux is no longer returning the film in the nice boxes that
I used to use to store my mounted slides. So, IMHO A&I is better,
even if it costs about $1.80 more per 24 exposure roll. 

If that last shot is irreplaceable then they are definitely worth the
little extra cost! 

HB
Harold R. Baize, Jr. Ph.D.                       
    baize@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 


------------------------------