Re: PHOTO-3D digest 1660

[P3D Michael Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> There's also the question of computer enhanced photos.  A good example is 
> the Time Magazine's issue when O.J. Simpson's picture appeared.  The photo 
> had been "enhanced" to give his face some shadowing and made it a bit more 
> sinister.  So, the "artist" took an image and enhanced it to solicit an 
> emotional response.  Is this a good thing?  A bad thing?

How's that significantly different from taking a picture with lighting that 
provides that same or some similar sinister shadow effect?  Say, with 
appropriately placed flash lighting by an assistant?

Mike K.


------------------------------