Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
re:Digital vs Analog (and where to get a cheap scanner)
- From: P3D Michael Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: re:Digital vs Analog (and where to get a cheap scanner)
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 96 18:44:00 PST
Can't resist, only one more time!
> >Good point. But doesn't it take an area of silver-image film to use
> >what I'm calling dithering to provide that continuous range of tone
> >or does the film use only density in the thickness-direction of the
> >film to create different gray tones, even for an infinitely small dot
> >in the film's area?
>
> I'm pretty certain it's more like the latter than the former, except
> rather than "infinitely small", it's the size of the grain that's the
> limiting factor on resolution.
I was talking more about tonality than resolution in this respect. Does
that one grain have an infinite range of tones?
I was using the terms Halftoning/dithering together to account for an
aggregate of silver crystal quantity/spacing as well as size (the halftoning
portion).
>
> >Does this mean that film has low resolution if I look at
> >it through a lens that has vasoline spread on it, or if the enlarger
> >that made the print was out of focus (just kiddddding) ?
>
> Even though you're joking, the resolution of the system is only as
> good as its weakest point. It's useless to argue about the theoretical
|