Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Good exposure
- From: P3D <PTWW@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Good exposure
- Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 13:47:19 -0500
Here's another message I sent last week that somehow didn't make it
into any digest. Again, sorry if this is a duplicate to anyone:
Dr. T writes:
>Of course, there is always the issue of "what is a good exposure"? Maybe
>because my viewers are brighter than average my choice of exposures might
>look a bit in the dark side by other viewers or in dimmer projection.
Dr. T raises a very good point that could stand to be expanded on
somewhat. "Good exposure" can only be defined with respect to a
particular *combination* of camera, film, development, and viewing
method. Some professionals recommend running a new exposure test
any time *any one* of these changes, even when merely changing from,
say, one Realist to another same model Realist. Certainly exposure
evaluation from $3 viewer to Themelisized Red Button to a particular
projector--and is that old or new bulbs you're projecting with? ;) --
will vary widely. Even changing the light source a viewer uses can
change the evaluation of correct exposure. Just try looking through
a favorite slide in your $3 viewer while sitting on the couch, then
get up and walk toward the light source until the viewer is just inches
from the light. You will probably observe *more than* a one stop
change in apparent exposure correctness as you move toward the light.
Paul Talbot
------------------------------
|