Re: 3D-LCD Software??

[P3D Larry Berlin <lberlin@xxxxxxxxx>]

>Date: Wed, 8 Jan 97 17:03 CET
>From: P3D  Joerg Meyer Inf.]  writes:
>>.........snip...............
>The amount of information is the same for even/odd lines and for even/even
>lines, the latter case also providing half the resolution of a full
>frame only. 

*****  Both methods result in half the information of the full frame.

>   During animation sequences I noticed that motion is smoother if you
>use alternative (even/odd) lines, because if an object moves in vertical
>direction within one half frame, the motion blur, which makes a motion
>picture more realistic than computer graphics, is reproduced in a better
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 00:22:46 -0600
Errors-To: 3d-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Originator: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
From: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: Multiple recipients of list <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: PHOTO-3D digest 1805
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment:   The Stereoscopic Image (Photo-3D) Mailing List  

>way. If you don't have motion blur, the image seems to jump between two
>time steps. It's a bit tricky to explain, but that at least is my             
>personal experience.

******   Interesting! What format of animation are you referring to? Are you
implying that one frame of animation is only half presented (one eye) and
that the next movement goes to the alternate eye? I would have expected to
present each eye with a complete stereo pair for each and every frame with
no movement until that combination is complete. In which case, using *same
line* information would still be important.

I understand about the blurring effects of motion, but would have expected
to use it equally in a stereo pair to insure the maximum effect in the
finished work.

Larry Berlin

Email: lberlin@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.sonic.net/~lberlin/
http://3dzine.simplenet.com/


------------------------------