Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Maxey Mea Culpa, Kinda


  • From: P3D <LeRoyDDD@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Maxey Mea Culpa, Kinda
  • Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 13:22:07 -0500 (EST)

Bob Maxey said:

"OK, OK, OK.

Let me clear a few things up. ANY type of stereo is
valid. After all, if there were not those out there willing
to try new ideas, we would all suffer for it. 

...I jumped for joy when 120 Kodachrome
roll film became available.

...In thinking about past posts, perhaps I
wrankeled a few feathers.

Remember, all stereo is valid; it helps all of us in one
way or another. Just do not send me emails trying to
change my mind."

     Thanx for the clarification, Bob. Now I can go back to reading and
enjoying the info in your posts, strongly held fixed opinions and all.:=) 

     Too bad for me, I understand Kodak has discontinued K64 in 120 size just
as I've begun to experiment in 120. :=(

     I second your opinion that Kodachrome is *best* for 35mm stereo,
well-nigh *essential* for ViewMaster, preferably K25, though I was impressed
with K200 VM images(though grainy) in the Expo.
     You might want to try Ektachrome Elite 100 II... grain almost not
apparent to me in most slides on viewing, and I can't see any on projection.

     Once again, since I'm reassured that Cliff hasn't been reincarnated on
the list :=), welcome...

LeRoy Barco
LeRoyDDD@xxxxxxx


------------------------------