Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: What will insurance pay?
- From: P3D Ronald J Beck <rbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: What will insurance pay?
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 10:47:21 -0600
>From someone who had some camera equipment, the insurance company will
review your loss and pay you based on the depreciated value of the item.
Then, if you purchase the exact same item new, they will reimburse you the
difference of what they already paid (the depreciated value) and the
actual cost of the new item.
So, if your Realist is stolen, they'll pay the depreciated value of the
camera ($50.00?). If you then head out to California and buy that $400
Realist from an unnamed camera store, the insurance company will reimburse
you $400.00 - $50.00 = $350.00.
Of course if you purchase a Belplasca to replace the Realist, you're hosed
as you'll only get the $50.00 from the Realist!
And, to add insult to injury, you better have some proof that you actually
owned the item(s) that was stolen. For example, owner manuals (with the
reciept stapled to the manual) would really be good! (yeah, right!)
Ron
photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
> > VALUE. (Try telling your insurance company that you paid $5,000
> for the stereo Realist you lost in a fire, and watch them laugh at
> you when you expect to be reimbursed in kind.) That's why there are
> such things as appraisers, who determine the VALUE of something,
> irrespective of its cost to you. They look at a large number of
> transactions, and transactions involving similar items, not a single,
> possibly aberrent sale.
> You only have to document as to why the particular one that you lost
> was worth $5,000 and why it'll cost that to replace it. Most
> insurance is at best "replacement cost", not the value of what was
> lost. If for instance, the one you lost was one that was worth $5K
> because it's the one the Realist's designer built and used himself
> -- you'd be unhappy with a $150 one that looks the same.
------------------------------
|