Delayed answer... RE: Anaglyphs...

[P3D Shelley, Dan <dshelley@xxxxxxxx>]

About a week ago, Paul Talbot wrote:

>The discussion of anaglyphs by DrT and Dan Shelley 
>has been informative. But I don't understand this point 
>Dan makes:
>
>>The key there is "provided that a choice exists". In printed 
>>materials, the anaglyph is the best way to reproduce a 
>>stereographic image. 
>
>Do you meant "best" considering certain (unstated) 
>constraints, or simply the best possible quality?  

My fault for not being clear... I meant that the anaglyph is the best 
choice on a budget. the glasses are cheaper that cheap lorgnette(how do 
you spell that?) viewers, and you only have to print 3 colors. (Red 
Blue and Black) Another thing to consider is that you can easily have a 
full 8.5x11" anaglyph page, but a pair would have to be MUCH smaller to 
fit on the page. In my opinion, a contributing factor in the judgement 
making process.

Sorry it took me so long to respond to this... =)

Dan Shelley
dshelley@xxxxxxxx



------------------------------