Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Kodak vs. Realist


  • From: P3D Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Kodak vs. Realist
  • Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 09:36:22 -0500

Elliot sez:

> Jess Powell...confirms that with the correct setup, the Kodak takes some
> of the sharpest stereo images he's ever seen.

Jess has seen a _lot_ of stereo cameras... he knows what he's talking
about.

The Kodaks don't test any better than anyone else's triplets, but I
think it is the coatings on their lenses which makes the difference.
They give very good contrast, and so the apparent sharpness is very
good. I also think the same is true for the Ilex Paragon lenses found on
early Realists... heavily coated, good contrast, good apparent
sharpness.

The Kodaks also seem to benefit from a lens/filter mount set up which
seems to act as a pretty effective lens hoods, further reducing flare
and kicking up sharpness.

As George points out, there is more to a camera than the lenses...

But not much more. 8-)


Eric G.


------------------------------