Re: Loreo

[P3D Peter Davis <pd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 10:26 AM 4/13/97 -0500, you wrote:
>you seem to talk a lot about the more expensive cameras.
>Is there anyone else on here besides me that likes the Loreo?
>I retired my realist format camera for a Loreo. I get much more 
>excitement out of it. The quality seems better too.

I'd love to learn more about this.  As much as I love the Realist for more
thoughtful, carefully composed shots, I get mixed results with it for
snapshots on family outings, etc.  Also, I'd like to shoot prints once and
a while so the non-stereo-enlightened members of my tribe can enjoy them too.

In what way does the quality seem better?

I've been thinking on and off about a Loreo or it's recently announced
competitor, the Argus.  Any comments pro or con regarding these cameras
would be interesting.

I've also played with a couple of "splitters" which produce similar results
to the Loreo and Argus.  My biggest complaint with these is that my SLR is
even bigger, bulkier, and (with the splitter attached) almost as
un-automatic as my Realist.

Thanks,
-pd

--------
                                Peter Davis
                     URL:  http://world.std.com/~pd/

                 "Nondescript -- the one word oxymoron."


------------------------------