Tom Hill's Opinions...

[P3D Dr. George A. Themelis <DrT-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Tom Hill writes:

>Is there any way to put George's messages in digests by themselves so
>I don't have to waste time sorting through his jibberish to get to
>the good stuff?

There are two possible solutions to your problem:  EITHER change 
photo-3d to ACK mode and put George and any others who's opinion 
don't care to read in a KILL file... You might be able to KILL 
postings by keywords (Realist, photography, film, etc.) but I am 
not sure.  OR, take your buddies and make your own list and get 
the hell out of photo-3d.
  
>It is such a pain to put up with egotistical opinions - stated as
>facts - about what's best in visual stereo that I have considered 
>several times to drop out of the P3D list.  I also know that I have
>learned amd will continue to learn from others, such as Larry, who are 
>focused on what's next in 3D visual presentations, and are using their
>knowledge of past work in stereo photography and the direction that 
>technology is headed to get there.

Photo-3d is a list about STEREO PHOTOGRAPHY, not a list about WHAT IS
NEXT IN 3D.  Stereo photography includes all types of photography and
all types of photographers and collectors of stereo images and 
equipment.  The list is diverse and either you put up with this fact
or you shut up.  The crap that you just wrote in your FIRST photo-3d
posting is the WORSE EGOTISTICAL OPINION that I have read in my 
3 years of participation in photo-3d.

-- George Themelis


------------------------------