Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
slide vs print
- From: P3D ron labbe <studio3d@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: slide vs print
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 18:06:06 -0400
John Ohrt wrote:
> A contact print for a Holmes
>card can have greater resolution than a 35 mm transparency or perhaps
>even a 60 mm transparency simply because it is a larger format.
I submit that the resolution in a 35mm Kodachrome 25 transparency is better
than any 3" contact print.
>You are overlooking the fact that positives are not necessarily
>transparencies. (eg. Polaroid positives, or shooting directly to print
>stock.)
I thought we were talking about the usual stereo formats, why bring up some
virtually unused formats?
>There are some "limits" to slide films:
Agreed. There's even more limits on stereoscopy!
John Roberts wrote:
>Do you understand the reason for each step in the processing of slide film?
What I understand is that the emulsion in the transparency image was burned
by the very light that was reflected from the real objects that the image
represents. First generation.
The emulsion in virtually any stereo print was not. Second generation.
Marvin Jones wrote:
>I believe the premise here is that in the reversal process film is
>developed, then re-exposed and developed a second time, thus yielding a
>"second generation" image.
Come on! RE-EXPOSED? To what? Not light! Because there's an extra bath it's
second generation? Developer, reversal, color developer... there is no
second generation- I just can't believe that there's an argument at all...
how'd I get sucked in? Is Tom Hill going to chastise me, too?
Remember when 3D was fun?
Steven D. Johnson wrote
>Wouldn't they be 'third generation', as the first generation would actually
>be the original scene as occurred at the moment of exposure? : )
HEY! Now you've gone TOO FAR! I'm never responding to PHOTO 3D again! Maybe!
(what if the "original scene" was a photograph in a magazine?)
ron
ron labbe/ studio 3D
30 glendale st maynard, ma 01754
ph 508 897-4221 mailto:studio3d@xxxxxxxx
http://www.studio3d.com
------------------------------
End of PHOTO-3D Digest 2007
***************************
***************************
Trouble? Send e-mail to
wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe select one of the following,
place it in the BODY of a message and send it to:
listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
unsubscribe photo-3d
unsubscribe sell-3d
unsubscribe mc68hc11
unsubscribe overland-trails
unsubscribe icom
***************************
|