Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: slide vs neg
- From: P3D Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: slide vs neg
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 09:07:44 -0500
John Ohrt wrote:
> You were doing great until the last sentence. :-)
Jee thanks, I am so relieved... 8-)
> One of the best ways of displaying an enlarged negative is as a backlit
> transparency. So if contrast, resolution, and accuatance are your
> concern, the best way to achieve a film positive is to enlarge/contact
> print a film negative to a negative medium.
Perhaps if I restate the point in different terms...
Certainly it is true that when displaying a film negative, a film
positive will be less compressed (and higher res) than a paper
positive... But how is this more advantageous than shooting a film
positive (chrome) as the original?
Eric G.
------------------------------
|