Re: Pulfrich and Real vs. Artifial 3D

[P3D Gabriel Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>With this logic I would take it to mean using one camera to capture
>>3D by shifting, to be artificial??? Of course not. So why is Pulfrich
>>artificial? The end result of Pulfrich, is true stereoscopic viewing.
                                             ^^^^   
>Sorry Gabriel, but you did not understand what I just said.

No I did, but I didn't state the above correctly. I guess you saw my
subsequent post to the above already. What I meant was not true but
rather referring to your fine definitions of "Real". You'll have to
forgive me, I getting sleeeepy.

- "Real" stereo
- "Artificial" stereo
- "Virtual" stereo

>Pulfrich is true stereoscopic viewing but I choose to call it "artificial"
>because the sense of depth is a result of relative movement and not real
>depth in the scene.

I can live with that. Or rather sleep with that thought in mind.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


------------------------------