Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Is hyper more natural than hypo?

  • From: P3D Dr. George A. Themelis <fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Is hyper more natural than hypo?
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 11:23:46 -0400 (EDT)
Someone mentioned that maybe it is because of motion parallax (or movement 
of our heads) that hyperstereo seems so natural.  Which brings the obvious
question, is hyperstereo more natural than hypostereo?

Assuming I record a familiar scene with half (hypo) and twice (hyper) the
normal interocular distance.  What is more likely an observer to
characterize as unusual (unatural?) the hypo or hyper?

-- George Themelis


------------------------------