Greg E's bridges

[P3D Bob Wier <wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

For some reason, listserv seems to have gotten very picky
about which messages it will relay - I've reset a few things
to make it more forgiving, so a few diverted messages follow...

--BW


>>From erker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  Fri Jun 13 16:06:58 1997
>Received: by bobcat.etsu.edu; id AA26739; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 16:06:57 -0500
>Received: from salph1.sask.trlabs.ca ([192.168.129.106]) by gateway.sask.trlabs.ca with ESMTP id <41537>; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 15:06:55 -0600
>Received: from [192.168.129.85] ([192.168.129.85]) by mailhost.sask.trlabs.ca with SMTP id <15311>; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 15:06:44 -0600
>X-Sender: erker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>To: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>From: P3D Greg Erker <erker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: How to photograph a bridge?
>Message-Id: <97Jun13.150644-0600_cst.15311+623@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: 	Fri, 13 Jun 1997 15:06:31 -0600
>
>
>>- Where can I find spectacular bridges to photograph?
>>
>>- What is the best way to photograph a bridge?
>
>  Saskatoon has some nice bridges that I like to
>photograph. One of them is a 1930's vintage
>concrete bridge with very attractive arches
>on the underside between each support pillar.
>
>  I took quite a nice photo of it last year
>using my twin Ricohflex's at about 12" separation.
>By positioning the cameras near one end of the
>bridge but a little off to the side I got a
>nice 3D pattern of receding arches. Unfortunately
>One image was semi-ruined by vignetting from
>a lens shade that wasn't seated properly. So I'll
>have to take that shot again this year.
>
>  Another idea is to shoot the underbody of
>the bridge to show the structure of all the
>supports etc.
>
>Good luck - Greg E.
>
>
>  



------------------------------