Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Breaking the rules
> I'm not saying realism should be abandoned, far from it. I just find it odd
> that so many things are labeled as being wrong, something the "educated
> stereographers" wouldn't do, instead of being used in some way.
> Paul Pascu
The distilled wisdom of what is done and what is not done in stereo
photography has grown to what it is through scores of years of trial
and error, criticism and daring. If one wants to do stereo
photography that is accepted as mainstream and "correct," it can be
done by "following the rules." Anything else will probably trigger
criticism from the old guard. Anything else will possibly be labeled
as "bad."
When Brahms ruled music, the rules of good music were similarly well
known, so when Mahler experimented with new sonorities, they sounded
brash and unacceptable. That was nothing compared with the total
dissonance and lack of tonality of Schoenberg and Webern, which broke
every rule in the book. To Brahms, the new music was never
Received: by bobcat.etsu.edu; id AA23901; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 18:09:56 -0500
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 18:09:56 -0500
Message-Id: <199706242252.PAA05911@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Errors-To: 3d-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Originator: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
From: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: Multiple recipients of list <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: PHOTO-3D digest 2148
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: The Stereoscopic Image (Photo-3D) Mailing List
Status: O
X-Status:
acceptable, but many people now love Mahler.
Perhaps stereoscopy is in a similar condition. Break some rules, and
there will be those who say, "THAT is ONE rule that may NEVER be
broken, even for art--it just is BAD." Remember Mahler, Schoenberg,
Picasso--Remember even Pons and Fleischmann if you must (cold
fusion?). Just don't forget that there were and also shall be
Velikovskys. Some, but not all, rule breakers will be exonerated.
Ken Luker
_______________________________________________________________
Kenneth Luker
Marriott Library Systems and Technical Services
KLUKER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
|