Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Parallel vs. crossed viewing
- From: P3D Larry Berlin <lberlin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Parallel vs. crossed viewing
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 23:34:29 -0700
>Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997
>From: P3D Dan Wenz asks:
>
>On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, P3D Larry Berlin wrote:
>
>>
>> What made the difference was deciding I was tired of tiny parallel images.
>etc.
>
>Do parallel-images look smaller to you than crossed? I find that the
>crossed-viewed images look smaller than parallel-viewed ones??
>
I was referring to the limits of eye movement that restricts the practical
size of parallel images to a rather small 2 inch center to center
separation. Crossed images may be of just about any size. From the right
distance you could cross view roadside billboards or even twin buildings of
identical architecture. Large scale stereo is definitely more enjoyable than
small scale parallel images.
If your images of each type are the same size, yes the crossed view will
have an appearance of being smaller, due to what I call projection effects.
I was not referring to this effect.
Larry Berlin
Email: lberlin@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.sonic.net/~lberlin/
http://3dzine.simplenet.com/
------------------------------
|