Re: Image Tech 3-D disposable

[P3D Gregory J. Wageman <gjw@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck Field asks:

>But I'm somewhat disappointed in the first two problems.  Did I damage the 
>camera, or is this just an example of poor quality auditing practices?  
>Should I send back my negs, with the really bad views, and make them redo 
>them?  Or is that gonna be a waste of time?  My wife loves them.  She things 
>the problems are minor, and I'm really not that picky either.  But, it seems 
>that we'd be rewarding them for doing a half-assed job.  And that might be 
>sending a bad message.


The first thing to check, Chuck, is whether or not the flaws appear on
the negatives.  If they don't, then their printer was messed up (junk
in the film gate) and a reprint job is definitely called for (on them,
of course).  If, however, the flaws appear on the negatives, then the
problem was with the camera, and reprinting would produce the same
results.

	-Greg W.


------------------------------