Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: exposure tables: slides vs. prints
- From: P3D John Ohrt <johrt@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: exposure tables: slides vs. prints
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 09:12:27 -0600
P3D Dan Keen wrote:
> Kodak's exposure tables for print films read one f/Stop more than for their
> slide films.
>
> For instance Kodak Webpage tables (or those inside the filmboxes):
> BrightSun/distinct shadows is 125@x/11 Gold ISO 100 printfilm, but is
> 125@x/16 for Elite ISO 100 slidefilm.
>
>
I have been told that the ISO number is based on a procedure developed for B&W
and may not always be a prudent point of comparison, especially between
dissimilar technologies. I suspect it is also inexpensive to perform as most
other film "specs" are that are commonly quoted. eg. using "resolution" vs
"MTF".
But then I may be misinformed or unduly cynical.
Regards,
--
John Ohrt * Toronto * ON * Canada
------------------------------
|