Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Twin 35
Jim Norman writes about his twin Conon EOS Rebel X 35s mounted
vertically. I am curious if he is using slide or print film with
these cameras.
Quite a few photographers are using twin cameras in vertical
orientation. I saw Otto Walasek using his twin autofocus Minoltas
in this configuration with 100 mm lens, taking stereo portraits of
the models. Still, the 3 3/8 lens' separation is hyper enough
to exclude a wide range of photography and a normal separation
stereo camera is needed, especially in moderate close-ups with
a normal/wide lens.
>The interocular distance is 3 3/8 inches, so my camera-to-foreground
>distance is about 8 feet. I'm limited to vertical formats, but for most
>subjects that's not an onerous limitation. I find that my most frequent
>use for horizontal format is for landscapes and such, and a twin rig is
>useless for such distant shots anyway.
For those who shoot standard stereo format slides, vertically oriented
stereos end up in Realist format mounts. A normal stereo camera
(Belplasca or RBT full-frame, for example) is needed for the landscape
composition. And, no, a twin rig or a regular stereo camera is not
useless for landscapes. Hyperstereo is not the only way to record distant
landscapes. I just saw a large variety of wonderful landscapes in PSA,
all recorded with regular stereo cameras. The trick is to frame your
landscape properly, including some foreground.
George Themelis
------------------------------
|