Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Beam Splitters (in the true sense of the word)
- From: P3D Michael Watters <mwatters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Beam Splitters (in the true sense of the word)
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 11:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Regarding shooting stereo through beam splitters:
It's works fairly well. I had a rig that I built using a 60/40 splitter
(I had it laying around, I corrected for the exposure. A 50:50 would be
best though). I used it for taking macro shots of flowers/bugs whatever
in real time. Has the added advantage of giving you the full frame to
work with.
The advantages are obvious:
Full frame, synced photos (taken at the same time. Only way to go
outdoors or if your bugs are still alive), REALLY narrow interoccular (my
rig was variable from 0 to 1 inch. I tended to always shoot at 1 inch IO
though.).
The disadvantages aren't so obvious:
The rig is gonna be big. REALLY big. It's also gonna be REALLY heavy
and awkward to haul around. Mine was roughly a 1x1x1 ft cube. You're
not gonna be handholding the thing. :)
One of the slides will have to be reversed in the mount (ie you're
shooting off a mirror so it's gonna be backwards). Just something to
keep in mind when mounting. Doesn't really affect how it looks on the
screen.
Flare - There's flare galore that comes off that mirror. I was able
to defeat it by painting the inside of the box everything was mounted in
flat black and putting a black hood over the back to actually shoot the
photo. (looked kinda like a view camera by the end actually... :)
If you can deal with the problems of the rig it works pretty well. I
wasn't too thrilled with the size of the thing myself. I used it a
couple of times then got rid of it. If you were planning on using it in
a studio-type situation though, it works pretty well.
mike
------------------------------
|