Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Generalizations and slide vs. print mounting


  • From: P3D Dr. George A. Themelis <fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Generalizations and slide vs. print mounting
  • Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 13:38:52 -0400 (EDT)

>I don't think it possible to say *anything* that
>can't be construed as offensive to someone when taken in all extreme cases.
>
>Including what I just said.

Mike, I want you to know that I am deeply offended by what you just said.  
Do you have any data to support your "theory"? :-)

Ha, ha, ha!  I love photo-3d!  No matter what anybody writes here, there 
is no way on earth I'll be offended.  Beat the Realist as much as you like.
I don't care!  Just don't say anything nasty about Greece or Greeks.
Especially Greek stereo photographers (they are an endangered species)

On a more serious subject, seems to me that it is not the print mounts
to blame but the processing places that return your pairs mounted on
one piece (slide-users don't have to worry about that :()  But if the 
stereo camera gives a window at 7 feet, does the mount disturb this?
(it shouldn't, but I guess this depends on the spacing of the pair,
as introduced by the processing place - hey, you can't please everyone)

George Themelis


------------------------------