Re: PHOTO-3D digest 2385

[P3D John W Roberts <roberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 02:09:07 -0600
>From: P3D MIKJR  <MIKJR@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: PHOTO-3D digest 2385

>David, et al...  there are those of us that collect, not so much for 3D value,
>but for the antique value, craftsmanship, and beauty of items made over 100
>years ago.  You may get a better 3D image from a new viewer, but you probably
>won't get the satisfaction of viewing 100 year old stereo views through a 100
>year old stereoscope!  There is more to life than a 3D image...  New is not
>always better.  mike aversa

That's irrelevant to your original question, which was why *anyone* would
prefer a newer viewer. Your explanation might account for why *some people*
would prefer an older viewer, but certainly doesn't provide a plausible
argument that *everyone* will prefer an older viewer.

John R


------------------------------