Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

P3D Re: boris starosta's site



> Consider that for ORTHO pictures with a stereo camera, the ideal subject
> distance is around 7 to 15 feet. That represents a finite range of

Can a picture be "ORTHO" without definition of the viewing environment?

Recall my suggestion about the "exercise" of walking-around-a-room in 
front of a projected image and seeing how "distortion" varies
significantly (more in some images than others) as one moves
around the room.  It really "works".  I've done it (club did too
a few weeks later).


> ****  So why is the shrinkage factor such an important factor that we have
> to explicitly point it out? We look at ordinary photos all the time and
> don't need an explanation that the images we are viewing aren't full size.
> We don't see a photo of a person and suggest it looks like a doll. Why is
> there such a reaction to a stereo photo of some large object which shows it
> at a smaller scale? Maybe it's the unfamiliar realism involved? I don't
> experience this reaction though I can observe the scale changes which seem
> extremely normal. The intrinsic meaning is abundantly clear without an
> explanation. It's all too similar to taking an airplane ride and upon
> looking out the window and seeing the ground and buildings from above, one
> comments on how they look like toys or models. Yet photos from the air or
> space are now common and after flying a few times it seems as normal to see
> shrinkage with distance applied from above as it does to viewing the
> distance horizontally from the ground. 

My personal experience is very different from this.  Looking at a 2D 
photo of a distant view, or looking out of an airplane window at all
the "small" houses, my brain interprets the situation as "big things
far away".  When I look at a hyper image view of the same, my
brain interprets "small versions of usually big things at some 
distance".  VERY VERY different to my brain's way of processing 
things.  


Other brains may vary.... :-)

Mike K.


------------------------------