Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Yes, explain "hyper" to beginners
>**** So why is the shrinkage factor such an important factor that we
>have to explicitly point it out? We look at ordinary photos all the time
>and don't need an explanation that the images we are viewing aren't full
>size. We don't see a photo of a person and suggest it looks like a doll.
>Why is there such a reaction to a stereo photo of some large object
>which shows it at a smaller scale?
Larry, welcome to the fascinating world of stereo photography! :-)
You know, I object when people call stereo images an "illusion".
I tell them that a flat picture is a worse illusion and yet no one sees
it as an illusion. "Here is my dad." "Sorry, this is not your dad.
This is a mixture of colors and shades on a piece of paper that create
an illusion that looks like your dad."
We have been accustomed to seeing 2D pictures since our birth and we
see nothing strange or fascinating about them. (But members of
primitive tribes reacted differently when they saw their first flat
pictures.)
So, what is the big deal with stereo pictures that makes people call
them "illusions"?
>Maybe it's the unfamiliar realism involved?
You got it buddy! Yes, "realism" is the key word. This realism can
be so pronounced that it scares some people. This looks so real and
yet I know it is not real. Therefore it is an illusion.
>However, having said all this, I agree it can be helpful for beginners
>to be provided explanations for stereo phenomena with which they may
>be unfamiliar.
I am glad you do. Here is a real story from my last public stereo
presentation: I showed a hyperstereo by Paul Wing, taken with a
single camera from a boat strolling down the Rhine (some people
collect stereos of the Rhine, I hear... :-)) After the show someone
came up to me and said that when he saw this picture he was sure that
it was a model and not a real scene. And he was glad that I explained
the "model effect" of hyperstereos because he would never have
believed that he was looking at a real scene.
I am so used to stereo images that I am not impressed by the modeling
ffect of hyperstereos. But I know that primitive people (those
unfamiliar with stereo) are impressed and I need to explain WHY and
HOW it works the way it does. I tell them the giant view vs. the
little model view and I think they understand.
>Larry Berlin
George Themelis
------------------------------
|