Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: Error Condition Re: P3D Re: PHOTO-3D digest 2469
- From: "Greg Wageman" <gjw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: Error Condition Re: P3D Re: PHOTO-3D digest 2469
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 1998 23:48:23 -0800
From: Robert A. Schreiber <bschreib@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>bschreib@xxxxxxxxxxx: You are not subscribed to photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>In addition, the system found the following address(es) that resemble yours.
>>If one of these is you, please resend your message from that one, or use the
>>'set <list> address' request to change the address you are subscribed with:
>>
>>BSCHREIB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Robert,
It seems you have the same problem with your ISP as my wife Susan. When you
subscribed, your ISP tacked a host name ("baste") onto the beginning of its
domain name ("magibox.net"). However, when you sent this message, it didn't, so
the listserv software didn't recognize you as the same subscriber. If your ISP
has made changes to their mailer configuration, this could be responsible. If
that is in fact the case and this new behaviour is permanent, I suggest you
follow the helpful instructions in the above message.
(<rant> In Susan's case, the brain-dead Netcom "Netcruiser" mailer configuration
adds the hostname of whatever particular host she happens to get connected to
that session, so she can never be sure she's posting from the same address [the
host will vary from session to session, in spite of the fact that she always
calls the same POP]. This behaviour is configurable by the mail system
administrator, but just try to tell Netcom technical support that you know more
than they do about anything [which is, in point of fact, actually quite likely,
even if you have the I.Q. of a lump of clay]. If you have a choice, stay away
from Netcom for your ISP. I don't have this particular problem even though I am
a Netcom subscriber, because I use a different type of account (Unix shell
account), which Netcom no longer advertises and basically no longer supports.
</rant>)
>> I just took my first stereo pictures - color film. I tried to get
>>them developed locally, but no one knew how to handle the fact that the
>>double image appears 1 1/2 times longer than normal. So, I got 4 X 6
>>pictures of the left-hand picture. I see that Kodak does color SLIDES,
>>but who develops color PHOTOS ?
Hmm, I'm puzzled as to what kind of camera you used? Realist frames are 5-perf,
so two side-by-side wouldn't be quite as wide as 1.5x a normal (8-perf) frame.
Perhaps if you give us a bit more detail about your setup we can give you more
specific answers. If you ARE using a Realist-format camera, there are a couple
of options available to you (all of which will be covered in the archives and on
the Web-based resources list mentioned several times recently, e.g. Grand
Photo). Several members have posted their experiences of "training" their local
1-hour photo technicians to print Realist negatives (possibly using a custom
mask, or a 126 mask).
-Greg W. (gjw@xxxxxxxxxx)
------------------------------
|