P3D Re: PHOTO-3D digest 2539

[Bob_Maxey@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

>>>In my designs, I can get around a patent by implementing a function
in a different manner than what a patent covers.  However, "the manner"
that the patent covers is itself an idea of how to do whatever it is.

Hey Mike, my suggestion would be to talk with a Lawyer who understands
Patents. You say that you can "get around a patent by implementing a
function in a different manner than what a patent covers." This is what
usually happens in the real world. A device is patented and someone
improves it and patents the changes, which get improved again, patented
again, and on and on.  However, even though you implemented something
differently, you still need to protect it, and that is what a patent does.

Patents cost money because a detailed search has to be made to insure that
you are not infringing somewhere.  Go to IBM's Patent Server and look
around. Try looking at all of the Stereo Related Patents, there are
thousands of them.

>>Strong patents are written in generic terms.  That is, without
technology-specific'isms, even though any given implementation
would consist of some specific technology.

Actually, this is partially true. However, you will often find some very
specific detailed information in patents as well.

Finally, a patent is as strong as the legal people backing you in court.
Some patent fights go on for decades and decades, even though most
reasonable observers can clearly see the infringer is harming you.

RM



------------------------------