Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

P3D Re: Cardboarding


  • From: Larry Berlin <lberlin@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: P3D Re: Cardboarding
  • Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 17:43:47 -0800

>Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998
>From: Bob Maxey  writes:
>...............
>CARDBOARDING: Under what specific conditions is everyone seeing this
>effect? If you take a photograph using a stereo camera, everything in the
>scene will have depth. Granted, not much in the mountains in the
>background, but even there, there is stereo separation - however slight. So
>what some are describing as cardboarding is unclear (to me anyway).
>
>In some images such as many VM reels, the effect described as
>"Cardboarding" happens because some of the props in the image as well as
>the actors in some cases, actually have no depth. In effect, the
>photographer is inserting a 2D object, which past experience and common
>sense tells us must have depth, into a 3D scene. If I take a 2D photograph
>of Dr. T, and he is holding out in front of him his large collection of 4.5
>Custom Realists with Seton Rochwite Polarizers and Redufocus Steinheils,
>and I make a life size, free standing cardboard cutout of the good doctor,
>and I place this in a scene with lots of foreground objects and mountains
>in the background, the image when viewed as a Flat slide might not look so
>bad. However, viewing it is Stereo will tell the tale and will give you the
>effect we are calling Cardboarding.
>
>Does this seem like a fair description and reasonable to any of you?
>

*****  Your description is classic cardboarding. However, the experience of
this circumstance takes place in many ways. As some have mentioned, an
exclamation about the cardboard effect is rather frequent when some persons
see their first stereo images. As such it's a subjective thing, related to
the classic example by way of illustration. It accurately describes what the
newcomer feels they are seeing. Those of us with more experience might
detect a lot more of the smaller parallax factors and include them in the
interpretation and for us it wouldn't be cardboardy... So the term applies
whether the effect is really present as in your example, or just looks that
way for a variety of reasons.

Larry Berlin

Email: lberlin@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.sonic.net/~lberlin/
http://3dzine.simplenet.com/


------------------------------