P3D Re: Stereography of whole planets

[boris@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Boris Starosta)]

>From Duncan:

>Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:37:14 +0000 (GMT)
...
>> (Look at starosta.com/3dshowcase/ihex2.html).
>
>Yep, just had a look. Good work, I'm sure, but not quite my cup of tea.
>Now you're starting to make me question what interests me in 3D. All the
>references in the world to 3D comics don't grab my interest a bit, and I
>think that 3D computer-generated stuff falls in the same category. I guess
>that if a monoscopic version of an image doesn't appeal to me, then
>neither will a stereo one. Hence, astronomical images really grab my
>attention, as do, for example, images from SEMs and conventional
>microscopes, of certain subjects.

Others have now made good comments to this, and I agree with them.  For
example, a terrible monoscopic picture (Look at
starosta.com/3dshowcase/iabstract.html), that makes a fascinating
stereoscopic subject.

>that, is that there is probably no point in me ever buying a Realist (am I
>speaking your language, Boris?),

Well, actually, no...  more on that in about a week!

>
>Boris, you've no soul! What better way to look at a globe than *as* a
>globe. And if you're going to look at a globe, let's choose one of the

As to arguing on the existence of my soul, that's best left to philosophers
and clergymen.  I do like Soukous, Salsa, Cuban, Brazillian, Senegalese,
and other very Soulful and danceable music!

Cheers,

Boris



Boris Starosta

usa 804 979 3930

boris@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.starosta.com
http://www.starosta.com/3dshowcase



------------------------------