P3D Re: C3D (was:Ban everything not specifically 3D?)

[Peter Davis <pd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 04:21 AM 3/25/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>The way I see this discussion polarizing is that those who feel
>>(justifiably or not) that they have been stifled on P3D when they've
>>attempted to provoke a discussion of digital imaging are in favor of the
>>new list, and those who aren't actively involved in digital imaging are
>>in favor of the status quo.  Seems to me that the digital folk have more
>>at stake and ought to win this particular argument.
>>
>>     -Greg W. (gjw@xxxxxxxxxx)
>
>Thanks Greg for this insight.  That's how I see things too.  It is not 
>about changing an existing list but about creating a new one to promote 
>discussions in the digital stereocopic field.  I am not sure how large 
>this list will grow but it has a good potential to grow and it will be
>of benefit for those who are active in the field.
>
>-- George Themelis
> 

But what about the people who don't want to talk about digital 3D, or film
3D, but rather about 3D and stereoscopic imagery in general?  There will be
no place for that discussion, and that would be sad, because there is far
more synergy and overlap among these fields than there are differences.

-pd


--------
                             Peter Davis
               Funny stuff at http://world.std.com/~pd

          Boycott spammers and other intrusive advertisers!


------------------------------