Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

P3D Re: V-M depth


  • From: pebaker@xxxxxxxxxx (Paul E Baker)
  • Subject: P3D Re: V-M depth
  • Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 12:27:45 -0500

>they don't seem to have much depth to them, not like the slides or
>Holmes style cards I do with my Revere 33. 

Possibly because the lens separation on a Revere is a bit more hyper than
on a V-M Personal (assuming that's the camera you're using).  Also possibly
because the focal length of the lens is slightly telephoto -- in other words,
you may find yourself stepping back so far to frame a shot that you're then
too far away from the foreground subject to get "good 3-D".  Unfortunately,
these two design characteristics work _against_ each other.  If you ever get
the chance to use a V-M Mark II, you may be happier with its results.

Paul Baker



------------------------------