Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D John' Twin Rig Fiasco
- From: John Ohrt <johrt@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D John' Twin Rig Fiasco
- Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 19:40:27 -0700
In case you missed it, The panorama feature is not 24x78 but rather
13x36. sigh.
Back to the store.
I was looking for a 65 mm lens spacing on a cheap camera. I plan to use
only a Holmes veiwer or to scan prints for computer display. Some
options are:
Use Kodak Funsavers. Bottom to bottom they can fit as tight as 51 mm,
side to side 100 mm. Since they are disposables, not very
environmentally friendly. No flash. Not cheap.
Use two real cheap 35 mm. Select for bottom to bottom fit of 65 mm,
just doable. Forget about using flash. Cheap, lots of film to choose
from.
Use two cheap 110 cameras in portrait mode. Can I get them close
enough?? You get to use a flash but the film choice is limited and the
negative size is small.
Right now I am discarding the funsaver option.
I'll check into a cheaper 35 mm option and the 110.
Stay tuned as the fiasco continues!!
Opions and suggestions most welcome!!
--
John Ohrt *** Toronto, ON, Canada *** mailto:johrt@xxxxxxxx
------------------------------
|