P3D Re: Stereo World Statistics...

["Dr. George A. Themelis" <DrT-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dick Woods writes:

>You're not suggesting that you would want to see half of Stereo World just
>about "how to shoot" and "this is what I took", are you?  As has been
>stated before, the books cover, in depth, the "how to" of stereo
>photography.  Something that is not covered by the many books on stereo
>photography would, of course, be a great addition to Stereo World.  

Exactly which books cover in depth the "how to" of stereo photography?
How many in depth books on stereo photography do you know that were 
written in the last 20 years?

And, if something is covered in some book, another person's point of
view, on the same subject, does not belong to a magazine?

And historical photographic research is appropriate for a magazine
while presentation of contemporary stereo photography is not?

(Just take a look at "3D-Magazin" if you want to see an example on
a succesful stereo publication on contemporary stereo photography...
in German only unfortunately...)

What I want to see in Stereo World is more pictures from people (and
more articles about people) who are ALIVE vs. DEAD. (That says it all)               
                          
-- George Themelis

PS.  And why is it, in your opinion, that photo-3d is, in your words,
"mostly shooters"?  Why collectors, like yourself, don't post more often
on the subjects that interest them?


------------------------------