Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

P3D Re: How best to sell your stereo slides.


  • From: jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Gabriel Jacob)
  • Subject: P3D Re: How best to sell your stereo slides.
  • Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 22:31:29 -0400 (EDT)

Boris writes:

>This is true of some of my best computer images as well.  And why would I
>compose a vertical scene on the computer or camera?  Because I feel that in
>composition, the vertical axis naturally gives more opportunity for depth.
>Look at my computer graphics stereo page:
>http://www.starosta.com/stereo.html
>for two examples of recent work that could not be done in landscape format.

I can understand the full vertical 35mm not readily lending itself
to the Realist format but I lost you on the computer format example
above. Wouldn't the computer example work well with the Realist
format? There both vertical formats.

>Members of this list interested in exploring the comparative value of an
>inexpensive orthoscopic 2x2x2 slide/viewer and their own Realist system
>should consider getting just one or two slide pairs from me, along with a
>viewer.  I still insist that the image quality with my viewer and slides
>rivals that produced by the Realist "system" (i.e. Realist camera, and Red
>Button viewer).  And now that I have my own Realist and R-B viewer, I feel
>more confident making that claim.  I guarantee your satisfaction.

I'm surprised Dr.T hasn't pounce on this yet ;-) (maybe he's mellowing
out with age, the big one is coming.). Sorry Boris but your way off
base on this one. Don't get me wrong I am very happy viewing slides
with $3 viewers BUT you can't compare it to a good quality viewer.
The chromatic aberrations are there. Even if you don't readily
see them they do diminish the 3-D effect and sharpness or reality
of the view. Look more carefully you'll see the difference and 
then realize they are nowhere equal or even similiar.

I do realize the there is economics involved in all this but for
someone that pursues ortho and professional quality images, a cheap
viewer is like buying an expensive stereo system connecting them to
cheapo speakers.

>Respectfully submitted,

Likewise. :-)

Gabriel


------------------------------