Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: 3-D beam splitter statement & info needed for new 3D camera
- From: michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Kersenbrock)
- Subject: P3D Re: 3-D beam splitter statement & info needed for new 3D camera
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 12:20:49 -0700
> Hi all! well, most of you told me so, and you were right! The beam
> splitter is CRAPOLA! I tried shooting with the 'Franka' beam splitter
> this past weekend and what a fiasco that was! So to all newbies to 3-D,
> it's not the way to go.
I have both a Franka beam splitter and a Pentax one. Your comments
aren't about beamsplitters in general, but are about the Franka one
specifically. Franka also has rear-surface mirrors rather than
front-surfaced ones.
The Pentax stereo adapter (beamsplitter) doesn't have the problems you
had.
Mike K.
P.S. - One requirement for splitter also not talked about in the last
month or so is that one should *ONLY* use them on front of a
lens that does NOT rotate the front filter ring when it focuses
(as the Pentax lens I attach mine to doesn't). The Pentax
unit is VERY VERY easy to use, align, and focus. Auto exposure
also works fine (with my Pentax SF-1 and other Pentax cameras
that I've used it with). Autofocus doesn't work, but it's TTL
focussing, and so focussing takes only a second or two.
P.P.S. - The Pentax adapter isn't a cheap starting point. Last I looked
a couple years ago, Pentax charged something like $350 for one.
Mine was under a hundred new, but that was a LONG time ago. :-)
------------------------------
|