Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Point and Shoot
- From: "Andrea Blair" <asblair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Point and Shoot
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 07:26:55 PDT
>>>>Andrea Blair wrote: I understand and can appreciate your reasoning
behind using the term, but I think it's a tad confusing since, according
to the three explanations I have read so far, every camera can
perceivably be a P&S.<<<<
>>>>Bob Maxey wrote: Regardless of the explanations you have read, this
is not true. I started selling cameras in 1973...long before the term
Point and Shoot was coined. The term was used to describe a camera that
was descriptive of the term Point and Shoot. These cameras were designed
to be as simple as possible. Remember, the term is a new one to some
extent. The 110 and 126 cameras were not described as point and shoot -
even though they could be used that way.<<<<
I really don't consider all cameras P&Ss. {:>) I only agreed based on
the *explanation* that once you set the camera for a particular
situation that you can shoot to your hearts content without adjusting
anything (P&S style), UNTIL something changes (a cloud goes over the
sun, the subject moves out of your set focus range, etc.). Once any
element changes and you have to adjust some knob, it becomes a manual
camera again. 110 and 126 (I even had a 127) formats are classic P&Ss,
even before the term was used. *Point* and *Shoot* (as my initial
objection that started this thread stated). Easy.
>>>>And the idea that every camera can be described as a point and shoot
camera is wrong. Are you telling me a Circkit Camera, an 11 X 14 View
Camera, a Mitchell 35mm Movie Camera and a Colorama Camera are Point and
Shoot Cameras? Hardly. Point and shoot is just that. You point it and
press the button. BTW: I use my Leica CL as a Point and Shoot Camera,
and hardly ever use the Rangefinder. I rely upon the focusing Scale to
indicate focusing. If I were to use my Realist in that way, the slides
would be even worse than they are when I point, estimate exposure, focus
and compose, select the required shutter speed and do everything as it
should be done (But not now, mine has a broken lens).<<<<
I have no idea what most of the cameras you listed are. {:>) Can any of
them be set once and take two or more shots under the same conditions
without resetting *anything*? If so, then by George's and Mike's
definition, it is (or rather, is used *as*) a P&S.
Anyway, I think you get the point that I really don't agree that a
Realist (or any other camera with adjustable settings) is a true P&S,
although some (if not most, or all) can be used *like* a P&S under
certain (and perhaps very limiting) circumstances.
Andrea Blair
p.s. Sorry to hear about your Realist. I'm sure George T. could fix you
up with another one in a pinch for a modest exchange of currency. {:>)
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
------------------------------
|