Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: the 2D Heavens
- From: George Gioumousis <georggms@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: the 2D Heavens
- Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1998 00:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Rob wrote
>
> >
> > If it weren't the case, astronomers wouldn't have to wait 6 months in
> > order to detect parallax between the nearer and farther stars, using the
> > baseline of the earth's orbit around the sun; they could do it nightly
> > using your methodology.
> ]
> Even this only provides enough parallax for scientific instruments,
> not stereography. I once though it would be neat to take pictures of
> the night sky at opposite seasons to use as a stereo base - until I did
> the math.
> Using the earth's orbital extremes as a stereo base (about 180
> million miles), is a hyperstereo of about 4 trillion to one!
> Sounds great, until you consider the closest star (alpha Centauri,
> unless they've found a closer one recently) is about 25 trillion miles
> away. Using the orbit as a stereo base will make alp Cen look like it's
> only 6 miles away! way too far for stereo.
> Kinda makes you appreciate the vastness of outer space, eh?
> Rob
> "Everything I have is Y1.96K compliant"
>
However, there was a very nice stereo of the moon in Stereo World a while
ago. Took careful planning to catch the two pictures at just the right
time in the orbit. Of course is pretty close by intersellar standards.
George
>
------------------------------
|