P3D Re: Can't see it? Is it there?

[michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Kersenbrock)]

> This shows that the judges placed more emphasis on aesthetics
> rather than on technical aspects of the images. It's much
> easier to quantify technical aspects rather than artistic.

Isn't the purpose of technical details the  same purpose 
of the artistic aspects?

That is, aren't they both working toward the same purpose
of having a pleasing image (or terrifying image... whatever)?

In other words, isn't the overall goal artistic?  So shouldn't
that be the way judging should seem to go?

I don't say that the technical details aren't important.
They are very important to the extent that they affect the
end result which to me is where the focus should be.

Mike K.


P.S. - I'm assuming we're not talking about using stereo for
       technical measurements, spy satellites, etc.






------------------------------